A devastating train hacking vulnerability has emerged in US railroad systems. The flaw allows attackers to control train brakes remotely using cheap equipment. This critical security breach affects all freight and passenger trains across America. CVE-2025-1727 represents one of the most serious cyber threats to rail infrastructure ever discovered. The vulnerability remained unpatched for over 13 years despite repeated warnings from security researchers.
Table of Contents
Understanding the Train Brake Vulnerability
The vulnerability affects End-of-Train and Head-of-Train remote linking protocols used throughout US transportation infrastructure. These systems, commonly called FRED (Flashing Rear-End Device), transmit critical brake control commands between train ends. The protocol relies solely on outdated BCH checksums for authentication.
Attackers can exploit this weakness using software-defined radio technology costing less than £400. They create malicious packets that mimic legitimate brake commands. This allows unauthorised brake control from considerable distances.
The railroad cybersecurity flaw received a CVSS score of 8.1 out of 10. CISA assigned CVE-2025-1727 a severity rating indicating high risk to transportation infrastructure.
How the Train Hacking Attack Works
The train brake vulnerability operates through radio frequency exploitation. Researchers Neil Smith and Eric Reuter discovered that attackers can use readily available software-defined radio equipment to create fraudulent communication packets. These packets contain unauthorised brake control commands sent to End-of-Train devices.
The attack requires three simple components. First, attackers need basic software-defined radio hardware. Second, they must understand the protocol’s packet structure. Third, they create malicious brake commands targeting specific trains.
The vulnerability enables attackers to force sudden train stoppages, potentially causing derailments, collisions, or complete brake system failures that endanger passengers and cargo. Successfully exploited attacks could shut down entire railway networks.
Impact on Railroad Cybersecurity Infrastructure
The US freight rail system consists of seven major carriers, hundreds of smaller railroads, over 138,000 miles of active railroad, and approximately 20,000 locomotives. An estimated 12,000 trains operate daily. All these systems potentially face this vulnerability.
The train hacking threat extends beyond operational disruption. Hackers could derail or damage trains, imperiling passengers and cargo, and wreak havoc on the precisely timed freight and passenger rail system. In the US, roughly 140,000 miles of track transport 1.5 billion tons of goods every year.
Military logistics face particular risks. The Department of Defense has designated 30,000 miles of track and structure as critical to mobilisation and resupply of US forces. Successful attacks could compromise national security operations.
Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-1727
The train brake vulnerability stems from fundamental protocol weaknesses. The protocol used for remote linking over RF for End-of-Train and Head-of-Train relies on a BCH checksum for packet creation. It is possible to create these EoT and HoT packets with a software defined radio and issue brake control commands.
Modern software-defined radios make exploitation straightforward. Anyone with the hardware (available for less than £400) and know-how can easily issue a brake command without the train driver’s knowledge, potentially compromising the safety of the transport operation.
The vulnerability affects multiple manufacturers. The AAR Railroad Electronics Standards Committee maintains this protocol which is used by multiple manufacturers across the industry, including Hitachi Rail STS USA, Wabtec, Siemens, and others.
Industry Response to Railroad Cybersecurity Threats
The Association of American Railroads is pursuing new equipment and protocols which should replace traditional End-of-Train and Head-of-Train devices. The standards committees involved in these updates are aware of the vulnerability and are investigating mitigating solutions.
However, solutions remain years away. Those new systems won’t be ready until 2027 at the earliest, according to Neil Smith, one of two researchers who independently discovered the vulnerability. The train hacking threat persists throughout this period.
Railroad operators historically resisted security improvements. At a time when they’re reducing engineers, increasing train lengths, and running ever more dangerous trains for maximum profits, there’s no way they’ll fix it unless it becomes unprofitable.
Current Mitigation Strategies
CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimise the risk of exploitation, such as: minimise network exposure for all control system devices, ensuring they are not accessible from the internet. Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolating them from business networks.
Additional protective measures include implementing virtual private networks for remote access. CISA emphasises that while no known public exploitation has been reported, the vulnerability represents a significant threat to critical transportation infrastructure.
Railway operators should coordinate with equipment manufacturers. Users of EoT/HoT devices are recommended to contact their own device manufacturers with questions. This ensures appropriate security updates when available.
The Role of Penetration Testing in Railroad Cybersecurity
Professional security assessments become crucial for railway operators. Working with top pen testing companies helps identify vulnerabilities before attackers exploit them. These assessments evaluate both technical controls and operational procedures.
Comprehensive penetration testing services examine railway control systems systematically. Security professionals test radio frequency protocols, network configurations, and access controls. They provide actionable recommendations for improving railroad cybersecurity posture.
Regular security testing identifies emerging threats early. This proactive approach helps railway operators stay ahead of evolving train hacking techniques.
Securing Infrastructure with Expert Penetration Testing Services
Protecting critical transportation infrastructure requires specialised expertise. Aardwolf Security provides comprehensive cybersecurity assessments for infrastructure providers. Our team understands the unique challenges facing transportation systems.
We offer tailored security testing services that address train hacking vulnerabilities. Our experts evaluate radio frequency protocols, control systems, and network architectures. Contact Aardwolf Security to discuss your cybersecurity requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Train Hacking and How Does It Work?
Train hacking refers to cyber attacks targeting railway control systems. The protocol used for remote linking over RF for End-of-Train and Head-of-Train relies on a BCH checksum for packet creation. It is possible to create these EoT and HoT packets with a software defined radio and issue brake control commands. Attackers exploit weak authentication in railway communication protocols to gain unauthorised control.
How Serious is the CVE-2025-1727 Vulnerability?
The assigned identifier to this vulnerability has an 8.1 out of 10 severity score. It is not yet included in the watchdog’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, which means that attackers have not yet attempted to abuse the flaw. However, the potential for catastrophic consequences makes this a critical railroad cybersecurity concern.
What Equipment Do Attackers Need for Train Brake Vulnerability Exploitation?
Wireless hardware to seriously disrupt rail transport costs less than £400. Attackers need basic software-defined radio equipment and knowledge of the protocol’s packet structure. This low barrier to entry makes the vulnerability particularly concerning.
When Will the Train Hacking Vulnerability Be Fixed?
New systems won’t be ready until 2027 at the earliest, according to Neil Smith, one of two researchers who independently discovered the vulnerability. The railroad cybersecurity industry faces significant delays in implementing secure replacement protocols.
Which Railway Systems Are Affected by This Train Brake Vulnerability?
All versions of End-of-Train and Head-of-Train remote linking protocol are affected. This includes systems from multiple manufacturers including Hitachi Rail STS USA, Wabtec, and Siemens. Essentially, all US freight and passenger trains face this train hacking threat.
Has Anyone Exploited This Railroad Cybersecurity Vulnerability?
No known public exploitation specifically targeting this vulnerability has been reported to CISA at this time. However, the simplicity of exploitation and availability of attack tools create significant risk for future incidents.
Technical Glossary
BCH Checksum: A mathematical algorithm used for error detection in data transmission, insufficient for security authentication.
CVE-2025-1727: The official identifier assigned to this train hacking vulnerability by security authorities.
End-of-Train (EoT): Device mounted at the rear of trains, also known as FRED (Flashing Rear-End Device).
Head-of-Train (HoT): Control system located in the locomotive that communicates with End-of-Train devices.
FRED: Flashing Rear-End Device, the common name for End-of-Train communication systems.
Software-Defined Radio (SDR): Programmable radio equipment that can transmit and receive various radio frequencies.
Radio Frequency (RF): Electromagnetic frequencies used for wireless communication between train components.
Further Reading
- CISA Advisory ICSA-25-191-10 – Official CISA advisory on CVE-2025-1727
- Transportation Systems Sector Security – CISA guidance on transportation infrastructure protection
- Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity – Best practices for securing industrial control systems
